| Revised April 2001
Executive Summary
On May 7, 1993 and recently revised in April 2000,
the New York City Department of Health (DOH), the New York City
Human Resources Administration (HRA), and the Mt. Sinai Occupational
Health Clinic convened an expert panel on Stachybotrys atra in indoor
environments. The purpose of the panel was to develop policies for
medical and environmental evaluation and intervention to address
Stachybotrys atra (now known as Stachybotrys chartarum (SC)) contamination.
The original guidelines were developed because of mold growth problems
in several New York City buildings in the early 1990's. This document
revises and expands the original guidelines to include all fungi
(mold). It is based both on a review of the literature regarding
fungi and on comments obtained by a review panel consisting of experts
in the fields of microbiology and health sciences. It is intended
for use by building engineers and management, but is available for
general distribution to anyone concerned about fungal contamination,
such as environmental consultants, health professionals, or the
general public.
We are expanding the guidelines to be inclusive
of all fungi for several reasons:
Many fungi (e.g., species of Aspergillus, Penicillium,
Fusarium, Trichoderma, and Memnoniella) in addition to SC can produce
potent mycotoxins, some of which are identical to compounds produced
by SC. Mycotoxins are fungal metabolites that have been identified
as toxic agents. For this reason, SC cannot be treated as uniquely
toxic in indoor environments.
People performing renovations/cleaning of widespread fungal contamination
may be at risk for developing Organic Dust Toxic Syndrome (ODTS)
or Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (HP). ODTS may occur after a single
heavy exposure to dust contaminated with fungi and produces flu-like
symptoms. It differs from HP in that it is not an immune-mediated
disease and does not require repeated exposures to the same causative
agent. A variety of biological agents may cause ODTS including common
species of fungi. HP may occur after repeated exposures to an allergen
and can result in permanent lung damage.
Fungi can cause allergic reactions. The most common symptoms are
runny nose, eye irritation, cough, congestion, and aggravation of
asthma.
Fungi are present almost everywhere in indoor and outdoor environments.
The most common symptoms of fungal exposure are runny nose, eye
irritation, cough, congestion, and aggravation of asthma. Although
there is evidence documenting severe health effects of fungi in
humans, most of this evidence is derived from ingestion of contaminated
foods (i.e., grain and peanut products) or occupational exposures
in agricultural settings where inhalation exposures were very high.
With the possible exception of remediation to very heavily contaminated
indoor environments, such high-level exposures are not expected
to occur while performing remedial work.
There have been reports linking health effects
in office workers to offices contaminated with moldy surfaces and
in residents of homes contaminated with fungal growth. Symptoms,
such as fatigue, respiratory ailments, and eye irritation were typically
observed in these cases. Some studies have suggested an association
between SC and pulmonary hemorrhage/hemosiderosis in infants, generally
those less than six months old. Pulmonary hemosiderosis is an uncommon
condition that results from bleeding in the lungs. The cause of
this condition is unknown, but may result from a combination of
environmental contaminants and conditions (e.g., smoking, fungal
contaminants and other bioaerosols, and water-damaged homes), and
currently its association with SC is unproven.
The focus of this guidance document addresses mold
contamination of building components (walls, ventilation systems,
support beams, etc.) that are chronically moist or water damaged.
Occupants should address common household sources of mold, such
as mold found in bathroom tubs or between tiles with household cleaners.
Moldy food (e.g., breads, fruits, etc.) should be discarded.
Building materials supporting fungal growth must
be remediated as rapidly as possible in order to ensure a healthy
environment. Repair of the defects that led to water accumulation
(or elevated humidity) should be conducted in conjunction with or
prior to fungal remediation. Specific methods of assessing and remediating
fungal contamination should be based on the extent of visible contamination
and underlying damage. The simplest and most expedient remediation
that is reasonable, and properly and safely removes fungal contamination,
should be used. Remediation and assessment methods are described
in this document.
The use of respiratory protection, gloves, and
eye protection is recommended. Extensive contamination, particularly
if heating, ventilating, air conditioning (HVAC) systems or large
occupied spaces are involved, should be assessed by an experienced
health and safety professional and remediated by personnel with
training and experience handling environmentally contaminated materials.
Lesser areas of contamination can usually be assessed and remediated
by building maintenance personnel. In order to prevent contamination
from recurring, underlying defects causing moisture buildup and
water damage must be addressed. Effective communication with building
occupants is an essential component of all remedial efforts.
Fungi in buildings may cause or exacerbate symptoms
of allergies (such as wheezing, chest tightness, shortness of breath,
nasal congestion, and eye irritation), especially in persons who
have a history of allergic diseases (such as asthma and rhinitis).
Individuals with persistent health problems that appear to be related
to fungi or other bioaerosol exposure should see their physicians
for a referral to practitioners who are trained in occupational/environmental
medicine or related specialties and are knowledgeable about these
types of exposures. Decisions about removing individuals from an
affected area must be based on the results of such medical evaluation,
and be made on a case-by-case basis. Except in cases of widespread
fungal contamination that are linked to illnesses throughout a building,
building-wide evacuation is not indicated.
In summary, prompt remediation of contaminated
material and infrastructure repair is the primary response to fungal
contamination in buildings. Emphasis should be placed on preventing
contamination through proper building and HVAC system maintenance
and prompt repair of water damage.
This document is not a legal mandate and should
be used as a guideline. Currently there are no United States Federal,
New York State, or New York City regulations for evaluating potential
health effects of fungal contamination and remediation. These guidelines
are subject to change as more information regarding fungal contaminants
becomes available.
Introduction
On May 7, 1993, the New York City Department of
Health (DOH), the New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA),
and the Mt. Sinai Occupational Health Clinic convened an expert
panel on Stachybotrys atra in Indoor Environments. The purpose of
the panel was to develop policies for medical and environmental
evaluation and intervention to address Stachybotrys atra (now known
as Stachybotrys chartarum (SC)) contamination. The original guidelines
were developed because of mold growth problems in several New York
City buildings in the early 1990's. This document revises and expands
the original guidelines to include all fungi (mold). It is based
both on a review of the literature regarding fungi and on comments
obtained by a review panel consisting of experts in the fields of
microbiology and health sciences. It is intended for use by building
engineers and management, but is available for general distribution
to anyone concerned about fungal contamination, such as environmental
consultants, health professionals, or the general public.
This document contains a discussion of potential
health effects; medical evaluations; environmental assessments;
protocols for remediation; and a discussion of risk communication
strategy. The guidelines are divided into four sections:
1. Health Issues; 2. Environmental Assessment;
3. Remediation; and 4. Hazard Communication.
We are expanding the guidelines to be inclusive
of all fungi for several reasons:
Many fungi (e.g., species of Aspergillus, Penicillium,
Fusarium, Trichoderma, and Memnoniella) in addition to SC can produce
potent mycotoxins, some of which are identical to compounds produced
by SC.1, 2, 3, 4 Mycotoxins are fungal metabolites that have been
identified as toxic agents. For this reason, SC cannot be treated
as uniquely toxic in indoor environments.
People performing renovations/cleaning of widespread fungal contamination
may be at risk for developing Organic Dust Toxic Syndrome (ODTS)
or Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (HP). ODTS may occur after a single
heavy exposure to dust contaminated with fungi and produces flu-like
symptoms. It differs from HP in that it is not an immune-mediated
disease and does not require repeated exposures to the same causative
agent. A variety of biological agents may cause ODTS including common
species of fungi. HP may occur after repeated exposures to an allergen
and can result in permanent lung damage.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Fungi can cause allergic reactions. The most common symptoms are
runny nose, eye irritation, cough, congestion, and aggravation of
asthma.11, 12
Fungi are present almost everywhere in indoor and outdoor environments.
The most common symptoms of fungal exposure are runny nose, eye
irritation, cough, congestion, and aggravation of asthma. Although
there is evidence documenting severe health effects of fungi in
humans, most of this evidence is derived from ingestion of contaminated
foods (i.e., grain and peanut products) or occupational exposures
in agricultural settings where inhalation exposures were very high.13,
14 With the possible exception of remediation to very heavily contaminated
indoor environments, such high level exposures are not expected
to occur while performing remedial work.15
There have been reports linking health effects
in office workers to offices contaminated with moldy surfaces and
in residents of homes contaminated with fungal growth.12, 16, 17,
18, 19, 20 Symptoms, such as fatigue, respiratory ailments, and
eye irritation were typically observed in these cases.
Some studies have suggested an association between
SC and pulmonary hemorrhage/hemosiderosis in infants, generally
those less than six months old. Pulmonary hemosiderosis is an uncommon
condition that results from bleeding in the lungs. The cause of
this condition is unknown, but may result from a combination of
environmental contaminants and conditions (e.g., smoking, other
microbial contaminants, and water-damaged homes), and currently
its association with SC is unproven.21, 22, 23
The focus of this guidance document addresses mold
contamination of building components (walls, ventilation systems,
support beams, etc.) that are chronically moist or water damaged.
Occupants should address common household sources of mold, such
as mold found in bathroom tubs or between tiles with household cleaners.
Moldy food (e.g., breads, fruits, etc.) should be discarded.
This document is not a legal mandate and should
be used as a guideline. Currently there are no United States Federal,
New York State, or New York City regulations for evaluating potential
health effects of fungal contamination and remediation. These guidelines
are subject to change as more information regarding fungal contaminants
becomes available.
1. Health Issues
1.1 Health Effects
Inhalation of fungal spores, fragments (parts), or metabolites (e.g.,
mycotoxins and volatile organic compounds) from a wide variety of
fungi may lead to or exacerbate immunologic (allergic) reactions,
cause toxic effects, or cause infections.11, 12, 24
There are only a limited number of documented cases
of health problems from indoor exposure to fungi. The intensity
of exposure and health effects seen in studies of fungal exposure
in the indoor environment was typically much less severe than those
that were experienced by agricultural workers but were of a long-term
duration.5-10, 12, 14, 16-20, 25-27 Illnesses can result from both
high level, short-term exposures and lower level, long-term exposures.
The most common symptoms reported from exposures in indoor environments
are runny nose, eye irritation, cough, congestion, aggravation of
asthma, headache, and fatigue.11, 12, 16-20
The presence of fungi on building materials as
identified by a visual assessment or by bulk/surface sampling results
does not necessitate that people will be exposed or exhibit health
effects. In order for humans to be exposed indoors, fungal spores,
fragments, or metabolites must be released into the air and inhaled,
physically contacted (dermal exposure), or ingested. Whether or
not symptoms develop in people exposed to fungi depends on the nature
of the fungal material (e.g., allergenic, toxic, or infectious),
the amount of exposure, and the susceptibility of exposed persons.
Susceptibility varies with the genetic predisposition (e.g., allergic
reactions do not always occur in all individuals), age, state of
health, and concurrent exposures. For these reasons, and because
measurements of exposure are not standardized and biological markers
of exposure to fungi are largely unknown, it is not possible to
determine "safe" or "unsafe" levels of exposure
for people in general.
1.1.1 Immunologic Effects
Immunological reactions include asthma, HP, and
allergic rhinitis. Contact with fungi may also lead to dermatitis.
It is thought that these conditions are caused by an immune response
to fungal agents. The most common symptoms associated with allergic
reactions are runny nose, eye irritation, cough, congestion, and
aggravation of asthma.11, 12 HP may occur after repeated exposures
to an allergen and can result in permanent lung damage. HP has typically
been associated with repeated heavy exposures in agricultural settings
but has also been reported in office settings.25, 26, 27 Exposure
to fungi through renovation work may also lead to initiation or
exacerbation of allergic or respiratory symptoms.
1.1.2 Toxic Effects
A wide variety of symptoms have been attributed
to the toxic effects of fungi. Symptoms, such as fatigue, nausea,
and headaches, and respiratory and eye irritation have been reported.
Some of the symptoms related to fungal exposure are non-specific,
such as discomfort, inability to concentrate, and fatigue.11, 12,
16-20 Severe illnesses such as ODTS and pulmonary hemosiderosis
have also been attributed to fungal exposures.5-10, 21, 22
ODTS describes the abrupt onset of fever, flu-like
symptoms, and respiratory symptoms in the hours following a single,
heavy exposure to dust containing organic material including fungi.
It differs from HP in that it is not an immune-mediated disease
and does not require repeated exposures to the same causative agent.
ODTS may be caused by a variety of biological agents including common
species of fungi (e.g., species of Aspergillus and Penicillium).
ODTS has been documented in farm workers handling contaminated material
but is also of concern to workers performing renovation work on
building materials contaminated with fungi.5-10
Some studies have suggested an association between
SC and pulmonary hemorrhage/hemosiderosis in infants, generally
those less than six months old. Pulmonary hemosiderosis is an uncommon
condition that results from bleeding in the lungs. The cause of
this condition is unknown, but may result from a combination of
environmental contaminants and conditions (e.g., smoking, fungal
contaminants and other bioaerosols, and water-damaged homes), and
currently its association with SC is unproven.21, 22, 23
1.1.3 Infectious Disease
Only a small group of fungi have been associated
with infectious disease. Aspergillosis is an infectious disease
that can occur in immunosuppressed persons. Health effects in this
population can be severe. Several species of Aspergillus are known
to cause Aspergillosis. The most common is Aspergillus fumigatus.
Exposure to this common mold, even to high concentrations, is unlikely
to cause infection in a healthy person.11, 24
Exposure to fungi associated with bird and bat
droppings (e.g., Histoplasma capsulatum and Cryptococcus neoformans)
can lead to health effects, usually transient flu-like illnesses,
in healthy individuals. Severe health effects are primarily encountered
in immunocompromised persons.24, 28, 29
1.2 Medical Evaluation
Individuals with persistent health problems that
appear to be related to fungi or other bioaerosol exposure should
see their physicians for a referral to practitioners who are trained
in occupational/environmental medicine or related specialties and
are knowledgeable about these types of exposures. Infants (less
than 12 months old) who are experiencing non-traumatic nosebleeds
or are residing in dwellings with damp or moldy conditions and are
experiencing breathing difficulties should receive a medical evaluation
to screen for alveolar hemorrhage. Following this evaluation, infants
who are suspected of having alveolar hemorrhaging should be referred
to a pediatric pulmonologist. Infants diagnosed with pulmonary hemosiderosis
and/or pulmonary hemorrhaging should not be returned to dwellings
until remediation and air testing are completed.
Clinical tests that can determine the source, place,
or time of exposure to fungi or their products are not currently
available. Antibodies developed by exposed persons to fungal agents
can only document that exposure has occurred. Since exposure to
fungi routinely occurs in both outdoor and indoor environments this
information is of limited value.
1.3 Medical Relocation
Infants (less than 12 months old), persons recovering
from recent surgery, or people with immune suppression, asthma,
hypersensitivity pneumonitis, severe allergies, sinusitis, or other
chronic inflammatory lung diseases may be at greater risk for developing
health problems associated with certain fungi. Such persons should
be removed from the affected area during remediation (see Section
3, Remediation). Persons diagnosed with fungal related diseases
should not be returned to the affected areas until remediation and
air testing are completed.
Except in cases of widespread fungal contamination
that are linked to illnesses throughout a building, a building-wide
evacuation is not indicated. A trained occupational/environmental
health practitioner should base decisions about medical removals
in the occupational setting on the results of a clinical assessment.
2. Environmental Assessment
The presence of mold, water damage, or musty odors
should be addressed immediately. In all instances, any source(s)
of water must be stopped and the extent of water damaged determined.
Water damaged materials should be dried and repaired. Mold damaged
materials should be remediated in accordance with this document
(see Section 3, Remediation).
2.1 Visual Inspection
A visual inspection is the most important initial step in identifying
a possible contamination problem. The extent of any water damage
and mold growth should be visually assessed. This assessment is
important in determining remedial strategies. Ventilation systems
should also be visually checked, particularly for damp filters but
also for damp conditions elsewhere in the system and overall cleanliness.
Ceiling tiles, gypsum wallboard (sheetrock), cardboard, paper, and
other cellulose surfaces should be given careful attention during
a visual inspection. The use of equipment such as a boroscope, to
view spaces in ductwork or behind walls, or a moisture meter, to
detect moisture in building materials, may be helpful in identifying
hidden sources of fungal growth and the extent of water damage.
2.2 Bulk/Surface Sampling
Bulk or surface sampling is not required to undertake
a remediation. Remediation (as described in Section 3, Remediation)
of visually identified fungal contamination should proceed without
further evaluation.
Bulk or surface samples may need to be collected to identify specific
fungal contaminants as part of a medical evaluation if occupants
are experiencing symptoms which may be related to fungal exposure
or to identify the presence or absence of mold if a visual inspection
is equivocal (e.g., discoloration, and staining).
An individual trained in appropriate sampling methodology should
perform bulk or surface sampling. Bulk samples are usually collected
from visibly moldy surfaces by scraping or cutting materials with
a clean tool into a clean plastic bag. Surface samples are usually
collected by wiping a measured area with a sterile swab or by stripping
the suspect surface with clear tape. Surface sampling is less destructive
than bulk sampling. Other sampling methods may also be available.
A laboratory specializing in mycology should be consulted for specific
sampling and delivery instructions.
2.3 Air Monitoring
Air sampling for fungi should not be part of a
routine assessment. This is because decisions about appropriate
remediation strategies can usually be made on the basis of a visual
inspection. In addition, air-sampling methods for some fungi are
prone to false negative results and therefore cannot be used to
definitively rule out contamination.
Air monitoring may be necessary if an individual(s) has been diagnosed
with a disease that is or may be associated with a fungal exposure
(e.g., pulmonary hemorrhage/hemosiderosis, and aspergillosis).
Air monitoring may be necessary if there is evidence from a visual
inspection or bulk sampling that ventilation systems may be contaminated.
The purpose of such air monitoring is to assess the extent of contamination
throughout a building. It is preferable to conduct sampling while
ventilation systems are operating.
Air monitoring may be necessary if the presence of mold is suspected
(e.g., musty odors) but cannot be identified by a visual inspection
or bulk sampling (e.g., mold growth behind walls). The purpose of
such air monitoring is to determine the location and/or extent of
contamination.
If air monitoring is performed, for comparative purposes, outdoor
air samples should be collected concurrently at an air intake, if
possible, and at a location representative of outdoor air. For additional
information on air sampling, refer to the American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists' document, "Bioaerosols:
Assessment and Control."
Personnel conducting the sampling must be trained in proper air
sampling methods for microbial contaminants. A laboratory specializing
in mycology should be consulted for specific sampling and shipping
instructions.
2.4 Analysis of Environmental Samples
Microscopic identification of the spores/colonies
requires considerable expertise. These services are not routinely
available from commercial laboratories. Documented quality control
in the laboratories used for analysis of the bulk/surface and air
samples is necessary. The American Industrial Hygiene Association
(AIHA) offers accreditation to microbial laboratories (Environmental
Microbiology Laboratory Accreditation Program (EMLAP)). Accredited
laboratories must participate in quarterly proficiency testing (Environmental
Microbiology Proficiency Analytical Testing Program (EMPAT)).
Evaluation of bulk/surface and air sampling data
should be performed by an experienced health professional. The presence
of few or trace amounts of fungal spores in bulk/surface sampling
should be considered background. Amounts greater than this or the
presence of fungal fragments (e.g., hyphae, and conidiophores) may
suggest fungal colonization, growth, and/or accumulation at or near
the sampled location.30 Air samples should be evaluated by means
of comparison (i.e., indoors to outdoors) and by fungal type (e.g.,
genera, and species). In general, the levels and types of fungi
found should be similar indoors (in non-problem buildings) as compared
to the outdoor air. Differences in the levels or types of fungi
found in air samples may indicate that moisture sources and resultant
fungal growth may be problematic.
3. Remediation
In all situations, the underlying cause of water
accumulation must be rectified or fungal growth will recur. Any
initial water infiltration should be stopped and cleaned immediately.
An immediate response (within 24 to 48 hours) and thorough clean
up, drying, and/or removal of water damaged materials will prevent
or limit mold growth. If the source of water is elevated humidity,
relative humidity should be maintained at levels below 60% to inhibit
mold growth.31 Emphasis should be on ensuring proper repairs of
the building infrastructure, so that water damage and moisture buildup
does not recur.
Five different levels of abatement are described
below. The size of the area impacted by fungal contamination primarily
determines the type of remediation. The sizing levels below are
based on professional judgment and practicality; currently there
is not adequate data to relate the extent of contamination to frequency
or severity of health effects. The goal of remediation is to remove
or clean contaminated materials in a way that prevents the emission
of fungi and dust contaminated with fungi from leaving a work area
and entering an occupied or non-abatement area, while protecting
the health of workers performing the abatement. The listed remediation
methods were designed to achieve this goal, however, due to the
general nature of these methods it is the responsibility of the
people conducting remediation to ensure the methods enacted are
adequate. The listed remediation methods are not meant to exclude
other similarly effective methods. Any changes to the remediation
methods listed in these guidelines, however, should be carefully
considered prior to implementation.
Non-porous (e.g., metals, glass, and hard plastics)
and semi-porous (e.g., wood, and concrete) materials that are structurally
sound and are visibly moldy can be cleaned and reused. Cleaning
should be done using a detergent solution. Porous materials such
as ceiling tiles and insulation, and wallboards with more than a
small area of contamination should be removed and discarded. Porous
materials (e.g., wallboard, and fabrics) that can be cleaned, can
be reused, but should be discarded if possible. A professional restoration
consultant should be contacted when restoring porous materials with
more than a small area of fungal contamination. All materials to
be reused should be dry and visibly free from mold. Routine inspections
should be conducted to confirm the effectiveness of remediation
work.
The use of gaseous ozone or chlorine dioxide for
remedial purposes is not recommended. Both compounds are highly
toxic and contamination of occupied space may pose a health threat.
Furthermore, the effectiveness of these treatments is unproven.
For additional information on the use of biocides for remedial purposes,
refer to the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists'
document, "Bioaerosols: Assessment and Control."
3.1 Level I: Small Isolated Areas (10 sq. ft or
less) - e.g., ceiling tiles, small areas on walls
Remediation can be conducted by regular building maintenance staff.
Such persons should receive training on proper clean up methods,
personal protection, and potential health hazards. This training
can be performed as part of a program to comply with the requirements
of the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200).
Respiratory protection (e.g., N95 disposable respirator), in accordance
with the OSHA respiratory protection standard (29 CFR 1910.134),
is recommended. Gloves and eye protection should be worn.
The work area should be unoccupied. Vacating people from spaces
adjacent to the work area is not necessary but is recommended in
the presence of infants (less than 12 months old), persons recovering
from recent surgery, immune suppressed people, or people with chronic
inflammatory lung diseases (e.g., asthma, hypersensitivity pneumonitis,
and severe allergies).
Containment of the work area is not necessary. Dust suppression
methods, such as misting (not soaking) surfaces prior to remediation,
are recommended.
Contaminated materials that cannot be cleaned should be removed
from the building in a sealed plastic bag. There are no special
requirements for the disposal of moldy materials.
The work area and areas used by remedial workers for egress should
be cleaned with a damp cloth and/or mop and a detergent solution.
All areas should be left dry and visibly free from contamination
and debris.
3.2 Level II: Mid-Sized Isolated Areas (10 - 30 sq. ft.) - e.g.,
individual wallboard panels.
Remediation can be conducted by regular building
maintenance staff. Such persons should receive training on proper
clean up methods, personal protection, and potential health hazards.
This training can be performed as part of a program to comply with
the requirements of the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR
1910.1200).
Respiratory protection (e.g., N95 disposable respirator), in accordance
with the OSHA respiratory protection standard (29 CFR 1910.134),
is recommended. Gloves and eye protection should be worn.
The work area should be unoccupied. Vacating people from spaces
adjacent to the work area is not necessary but is recommended in
the presence of infants (less than 12 months old), persons having
undergone recent surgery, immune suppressed people, or people with
chronic inflammatory lung diseases (e.g., asthma, hypersensitivity
pneumonitis, and severe allergies).
The work area should be covered with a plastic sheet(s) and sealed
with tape before remediation, to contain dust/debris.
Dust suppression methods, such as misting (not soaking) surfaces
prior to remediation, are recommended.
Contaminated materials that cannot be cleaned should be removed
from the building in sealed plastic bags. There are no special requirements
for the disposal of moldy materials.
The work area and areas used by remedial workers for egress should
be HEPA vacuumed (a vacuum equipped with a High-Efficiency Particulate
Air filter) and cleaned with a damp cloth and/or mop and a detergent
solution.
All areas should be left dry and visibly free from contamination
and debris.
3.3 Level III: Large Isolated Areas (30 - 100 square feet) - e.g.,
several wallboard panels.
A health and safety professional with experience
performing microbial investigations should be consulted prior to
remediation activities to provide oversight for the project.
The following procedures at a minimum are recommended:
Personnel trained in the handling of hazardous
materials and equipped with respiratory protection, (e.g., N95 disposable
respirator), in accordance with the OSHA respiratory protection
standard (29 CFR 1910.134), is recommended. Gloves and eye protection
should be worn.
The work area and areas directly adjacent should be covered with
a plastic sheet(s) and taped before remediation, to contain dust/debris.
Seal ventilation ducts/grills in the work area and areas directly
adjacent with plastic sheeting.
The work area and areas directly adjacent should be unoccupied.
Further vacating of people from spaces near the work area is recommended
in the presence of infants (less than 12 months old), persons having
undergone recent surgery, immune suppressed people, or people with
chronic inflammatory lung diseases (e.g., asthma, hypersensitivity
pneumonitis, and severe allergies).
Dust suppression methods, such as misting (not soaking) surfaces
prior to remediation, are recommended.
Contaminated materials that cannot be cleaned should be removed
from the building in sealed plastic bags. There are no special requirements
for the disposal of moldy materials.
The work area and surrounding areas should be HEPA vacuumed and
cleaned with a damp cloth and/or mop and a detergent solution.
All areas should be left dry and visibly free from contamination
and debris.
If abatement procedures are expected to generate a lot of dust (e.g.,
abrasive cleaning of contaminated surfaces, demolition of plaster
walls) or the visible concentration of the fungi is heavy (blanket
coverage as opposed to patchy), then it is recommended that the
remediation procedures for Level IV are followed.
3.4 Level IV: Extensive Contamination (greater
than 100 contiguous square feet in an area)
A health and safety professional with experience
performing microbial investigations should be consulted prior to
remediation activities to provide oversight for the project. The
following procedures are recommended:
Personnel trained in the handling of hazardous
materials equipped with:
Full-face respirators with high efficiency particulate air (HEPA)
cartridges
Disposable protective clothing covering both head and shoes
Gloves
Containment of the affected area:
Complete isolation of work area from occupied spaces using plastic
sheeting sealed with duct tape (including ventilation ducts/grills,
fixtures, and any other openings)
The use of an exhaust fan with a HEPA filter to generate negative
pressurization
Airlocks and decontamination room
Vacating people from spaces adjacent to the work area is not necessary
but is recommended in the presence of infants (less than 12 months
old), persons having undergone recent surgery, immune suppressed
people, or people with chronic inflammatory lung diseases (e.g.,
asthma, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and severe allergies).
Contaminated materials that cannot be cleaned should be removed
from the building in sealed plastic bags. The outside of the bags
should be cleaned with a damp cloth and a detergent solution or
HEPA vacuumed in the decontamination chamber prior to their transport
to uncontaminated areas of the building. There are no special requirements
for the disposal of moldy materials.
The contained area and decontamination room should be HEPA vacuumed
and cleaned with a damp cloth and/or mop with a detergent solution
and be visibly clean prior to the removal of isolation barriers.
Air monitoring should be conducted prior to occupancy to determine
if the area is fit to reoccupy.
3.5 Level V: Remediation of HVAC Systems
3.5.1 A Small Isolated Area of Contamination (<10
square feet) in the HVAC System
Remediation can be conducted by regular building
maintenance staff. Such persons should receive training on proper
clean up methods, personal protection, and potential health hazards.
This training can be performed as part of a program to comply with
the requirements of the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR
1910.1200).
Respiratory protection (e.g., N95 disposable respirator), in accordance
with the OSHA respiratory protection standard (29 CFR 1910.134),
is recommended. Gloves and eye protection should be worn.
The HVAC system should be shut down prior to any remedial activities.
The work area should be covered with a plastic sheet(s) and sealed
with tape before remediation, to contain dust/debris.
Dust suppression methods, such as misting (not soaking) surfaces
prior to remediation, are recommended.
Growth supporting materials that are contaminated, such as the paper
on the insulation of interior lined ducts and filters, should be
removed. Other contaminated materials that cannot be cleaned should
be removed in sealed plastic bags. There are no special requirements
for the disposal of moldy materials.
The work area and areas immediately surrounding the work area should
be HEPA vacuumed and cleaned with a damp cloth and/or mop and a
detergent solution.
All areas should be left dry and visibly free from contamination
and debris.
A variety of biocides are recommended by HVAC manufacturers for
use with HVAC components, such as, cooling coils and condensation
pans. HVAC manufacturers should be consulted for the products they
recommend for use in their systems.
3.5.2 Areas of Contamination (>10 square feet) in the HVAC System
A health and safety professional with experience
performing microbial investigations should be consulted prior to
remediation activities to provide oversight for remediation projects
involving more than a small isolated area in an HVAC system. The
following procedures are recommended:
Personnel trained in the handling of hazardous
materials equipped with:
Respiratory protection (e.g., N95 disposable respirator), in accordance
with the OSHA respiratory protection standard (29 CFR 1910.134),
is recommended.
Gloves and eye protection
Full-face respirators with HEPA cartridges and disposable protective
clothing covering both head and shoes should be worn if contamination
is greater than 30 square feet.
The HVAC system should be shut down prior to any remedial activities.
Containment of the affected area:
Complete isolation of work area from the other areas of the HVAC
system using plastic sheeting sealed with duct tape.
The use of an exhaust fan with a HEPA filter to generate negative
pressurization.
Airlocks and decontamination room if contamination is greater than
30 square feet.
Growth supporting materials that are contaminated, such as the paper
on the insulation of interior lined ducts and filters, should be
removed. Other contaminated materials that cannot be cleaned should
be removed in sealed plastic bags. When a decontamination chamber
is present, the outside of the bags should be cleaned with a damp
cloth and a detergent solution or HEPA vacuumed prior to their transport
to uncontaminated areas of the building. There are no special requirements
for the disposal of moldy materials.
The contained area and decontamination room should be HEPA vacuumed
and cleaned with a damp cloth and/or mop and a detergent solution
prior to the removal of isolation barriers.
All areas should be left dry and visibly free from contamination
and debris.
Air monitoring should be conducted prior to re-occupancy with the
HVAC system in operation to determine if the area(s) served by the
system are fit to reoccupy.
A variety of biocides are recommended by HVAC manufacturers for
use with HVAC components, such as, cooling coils and condensation
pans. HVAC manufacturers should be consulted for the products they
recommend for use in their systems.
4. Hazard Communication
When fungal growth requiring large-scale remediation
is found, the building owner, management, and/or employer should
notify occupants in the affected area(s) of its presence. Notification
should include a description of the remedial measures to be taken
and a timetable for completion. Group meetings held before and after
remediation with full disclosure of plans and results can be an
effective communication mechanism. Individuals with persistent health
problems that appear to be related to bioaerosol exposure should
see their physicians for a referral to practitioners who are trained
in occupational/environmental medicine or related specialties and
are knowledgeable about these types of exposures. Individuals seeking
medical attention should be provided with a copy of all inspection
results and interpretation to give to their medical practitioners.
Conclusion
In summary, the prompt remediation of contaminated
material and infrastructure repair must be the primary response
to fungal contamination in buildings. The simplest and most expedient
remediation that properly and safely removes fungal growth from
buildings should be used. In all situations, the underlying cause
of water accumulation must be rectified or the fungal growth will
recur. Emphasis should be placed on preventing contamination through
proper building maintenance and prompt repair of water damaged areas.
Widespread contamination poses much larger problems
that must be addressed on a case-by-case basis in consultation with
a health and safety specialist. Effective communication with building
occupants is an essential component of all remedial efforts. Individuals
with persistent health problems should see their physicians for
a referral to practitioners who are trained in occupational/environmental
medicine or related specialties and are knowledgeable about these
types of exposures.
Notes and References
Bata A, Harrach B, Kalman U, Kis-tamas A, Lasztity
R. Macrocyclic Trichothecene Toxins Produced by Stachybotrys atra
Strains Isolated in Middle Europe. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
1985; 49:678-81.
Jarvis B, "Mycotoxins and Indoor Air Quality," Biological
Contaminants in Indoor Environments, ASTM STP 1071, Morey P, Feely
Sr. J, Otten J, Editors, American Society for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, 1990.
Yang C, Johanning E, "Airborne Fungi and Mycotoxins,"
Manual of Environmental Microbiology, Hurst C, Editor in Chief,
ASM Press, Washington, D.C., 1996
Jarvis B, Mazzola E. Macrocyclic and Other Novel Trichothecenes:
Their Structure, Synthesis, and Biological Significance. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1982; 15:388-95.
Von Essen S, Robbins R, Thompson A, Rennard S. Organic Dust Toxic
Syndrome: An Acute Febrile Reaction to Organic Dust Exposure Distinct
from Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis. Clinical Toxicology 1990; 28(4):389-420.
Richerson H. Unifying Concepts Underlying the Effects of Organic
Dust Exposures. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1990; 17:139-42.
Malmberg P, Rask-Andersen A, Lundholm M, Palmgren U. Can Spores
from Molds and Actinomycetes Cause an Organic Dust Toxic Syndrome
Reaction?. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1990; 17:109-10.
Malmberg P. Health Effects of Organic Dust Exposure in Dairy Farmers.
American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1990; 17:7-15.
Yoshida K, Masayuki A, Shukuro A. Acute Pulmonary Edema in a Storehouse
of Moldy Oranges: A Severe Case of the Organic Dust Toxic Syndrome.
Archives of Environmental Health 1989; 44(6): 382-84.
Lecours R, Laviolette M, Cormier Y. Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Pulmonary
Mycotoxicosis. Thorax 1986; 41:924-6.
Levetin E. "Fungi," Bioaerosols, Burge H, Editor, CRC
Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1995.
Husman T. Health Effects of Indoor-air Microorganisms. Scand J Work
Environ Health 1996; 22:5-13.
Miller J D. Fungi and Mycotoxins in Grain: Implications for Stored
Product Research. J Stored Prod Res 1995; 31(1):1-16.
Cookingham C, Solomon W. "Bioaerosol-Induced Hypersensitivity
Diseases," Bioaerosols, Burge H, Editor, CRC Press, Boca Raton,
Florida, 1995.
Rautiala S, Reponen T, Nevalainen A, Husman T, Kalliokoski P. Control
of Exposure to Airborne Viable Microorganisms During Remediation
of Moldy Buildings; Report of Three Case Studies. American Industrial
Hygiene Association Journal 1998; 59:455-60.
Dales R, Zwanenburg H, Burnett R, Franklin C. Respiratory Health
Effects of Home Dampness and Molds among Canadian Children. American
Journal of Epidemiology 1991; 134(2): 196-203.
Hodgson M, Morey P, Leung W, Morrow L, Miller J D, Jarvis B, Robbins
H, Halsey J, Storey E. Building-Associated Pulmonary Disease from
Exposure to Stachybotrys chartarum and Aspergillus versicolor. Journal
of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1998; 40(3)241-9.
Croft W, Jarvis B, Yatawara C. Airborne Outbreak of Trichothecene
Toxicosis. Atmospheric Environment 1986; 20(3)549-52.
DeKoster J, Thorne P. Bioaerosol Concentrations in Noncomplaint,
Complaint, and Intervention Homes in the Midwest. American Industrial
Hygiene Association Journal 1995; 56:573-80.
Johanning E, Biagini R, Hull D, Morey P, Jarvis B, Landbergis P.
Health and Immunological Study Following Exposure to Toxigenic Fungi
(Stachybotrys chartarum) in a Water-Damaged Office Environment.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1996; 68:207-18.
Montana E, Etzel R, Allan T, Horgan T, Dearborn D. Environmental
Risk Factor Associated with Pediatric Idiopathic Pulmonary Hemorrhage
and Hemosiderosis in a Cleveland Community. Pediatrics 1997; 99(1)
Etzel R, Montana E, Sorenson W G, Kullman G, Allan T, Dearborn D.
Acute Pulmonary Hemorrhage in Infants Associated with Exposure to
Stachybotrys atra and Other Fungi. Ach Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;
152:757-62.
CDC. Update: Pulmonary Hemorrhage/Hemosiderosis Among Infants ---
Cleveland, Ohio, 1993 - 1996. MMWR 2000; 49(9): 180-4.
Burge H, Otten J. "Fungi," Bioaerosols Assessment and
Control, Macher J, Editor, American Conference of Industrial Hygienists,
Cincinnati, Ohio, 1999.
do Pico G. Hazardous Exposure and Lung Disease Among Farm Workers.
Clinics in Chest Medicine 1992; 13(2):311-28.
Hodgson M, Morey P, Attfield M, Sorenson W, Fink J, Rhodes W, Visvesvara
G. Pulmonary Disease Associated with Cafeteria Flooding. Archives
of Environmental Health 1985; 40(2):96-101.
Weltermann B, Hodgson M, Storey E, DeGraff, Jr. A, Bracker A, Groseclose
S, Cole S, Cartter M, Phillips D. Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis:
A Sentinel Event Investigation in a Wet Building. American Journal
of Industrial Medicine 1998; 34:499-505.
Band J. "Histoplasmosis," Occupational Respiratory Diseases,
Merchant J, Editor, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Washington D.C., 1986.
Bertolini R. "Histoplasmosis A Summary of the Occupational
Health Concern," Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and
Safety. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 1988.
Yang C. P&K Microbiology Services, Inc. Microscopic Examination
of Sticky Tape or Bulk Samples for the Evaluation and Identification
of Fungi. Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning
Engineers, Inc. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy
- ASHRAE Standard (ANSI/ASHRAE 55-1992). Atlanta, Georgia, 1992.
Acknowledgments
The New York City Department of Health would like
to thank the following individuals and organizations for participating
in the revision of these guidelines. Please note that these guidelines
do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the participants nor
their organizations.
Name Company/Institution
Dr. Susan Klitzman
Hunter College
Dr. Philip Morey
AQS Services, Inc
Dr. Donald Ahearn
Georgia State University
Dr. Sidney Crow
Georgia State University
Dr. J. David Miller
Carleton University
Dr. Bruce Jarvis
University of Maryland at College Park
Mr. Ed Light
Building Dynamics, LLC
Dr. Chin Yang
P&K Microbiology Services, Inc
Dr. Harriet Burge
Harvard School of Public Health
Dr. Dorr Dearborn
Rainbow Children's Hospital
Mr. Eric Esswein
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Dr. Ed Horn
The New York State Department of Health
Dr. Judith Schreiber
The New York State Department of Health
Mr. Gregg Recer
The New York State Department of Health
Dr. Gerald Llewellyn
State of Delaware, Division of Public Health
Mr. Daniel Price
Interface Research Corporation
Ms. Sylvia Pryce
The NYC Citywide Office of Occupational Safety and Health
Mr. Armando Chamorro
Ambient Environmental
Ms. Marie-Alix d'Halewyn
Laboratoire de santé publique du Québec
Dr. Elissa A. Favata
Environmental and Occupational Health Associates
Dr. Harriet Ammann
Washington State Department of Health
Mr. Terry Allan
Cuyahoga County Board of Health
We would also like to thank the many others who offered opinions,
comments, and assistance at various stages during the development
of these guidelines.
Christopher D'Andrea, M.S. of the Environmental
and Occupational Disease Epidemiology Unit, was the editor of this
document.
For further information regarding this document
please contact the New York City Department of Health at (212) 788-4290.
top of page ^
|